Pricing change

2×. 3×. 5×.

The three-step price-change narrative we use on every project

How we deliver 25× price increases without losing customers. Built from ~30 pricing projects a year.

Price increases dont fail on the number. They fail on the story.

Most pricing projects we run involve material price changes. Often a doubling or a tripling. Occasionally a 5×. The question is rarely can you raise prices the data almost always says yes. The question is: how do you tell the customer base in a way that doesnt cost you the customer base?

After ~200 projects, the same pattern shows up. The increases that hold are the ones that come with a story the customer can repeat to themselves and to their boss. The increases that dont hold are the ones that arrive as a number.

Three steps. Million-dollar accounts and self-serve users alike.

The three steps

Most price increases fail on step one.

/01
Frame it as a return to fairness
“Our prices haven’t moved in three years while what we deliver has.” Not a defense — a statement that lands because it’s true. The lift becomes a recalibration to what the product is now, not a tax.
/02
Pair it with something new
Anchoring, a packaging shift, or a feature that arrives with the new price. The customer trades up rather than paying more for the same thing. Most of the work is making sure something genuinely new is on the table.
/03
Give long-term customers recognition
Grandfathering. Tier transitions. Ambassador programs. The five-year customer who learns about a price change on the same page as a new prospect is the customer you lose.

Worked example

How we 3×d prices for a SaaS client with <2% churn impact

A B2B SaaS client serving mid-market operations teams. Stable customer base, low churn, NPS in the 60s. The list price hadnt moved in three years; the product had shipped two major new capability lines in that window. The willingness-to-pay data said the list price was roughly a third of fair value.

The plan: a 3× list-price move, paired with a packaging rebuild (three tiers, new boundaries), grandfathering for any account older than 18 months on a two-year glidepath, and an ambassador tier for the top 30 long-tenured customers.

Frame: the new pricing reflects what the product became, not what it was. Pair: every tier gained something net new at the new price not just a higher price for the same thing. Recognize: the long-tenured 30 got named, kept on old pricing through the glidepath, and given a small advisory role on the next packaging release.

Result: 3× list-price lift on new sales. Net churn impact across the existing base: under 2%. The accounts that left were not the long-tenured ones they were a small middle band that the new tier structure had quietly priced out, which the data had predicted.

Want this run for your business?

A 30-minute pricing audit. Well tell you what wed change.

Rethink how much you charge.

Get The Monday Price Point - actionable insight every Monday.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.